MnetTV          Digital Library

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net
Today in Manufacturing.Net

Resources
Association Links
Bookstore
Digital Library
Events Calendar
Job Search
What’s New
White Papers

Browse White Papers


News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
People in the News

Job Search


Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive/Transportation
Chemical/Petroleum
Food/Beverage
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals/Biotech
Plastics/Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Electrical & Electronics
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Amazon

About Us
Editorial Contacts
Advertise with Us

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week



 


Mnet house ad 120x240



What Will Happen To GM's Wisconsin Plant?
By Dinesh Ramde, Associated Press Writer
Manufacturing.Net - June 26, 2009

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague


JANESVILLE, Wis. (AP) -- The oldest plant in the General Motors Corp. family faces an uncertain future after the automaker decided against bringing new production to the recently shuttered facility in Janesville, Wis.

Instead GM chose the plant in Orion Township, Mich., about 40 miles north of Detroit, to build its next-generation small car. Wisconsin officials, who had hoped GM would return some 1,200 workers to the local production line, expressed concern and disappointment at the decision, but one former autoworker wasn't surprised.

GM confirmed the plant selection in a statement Friday, but said the decision is dependent on the outcome of negotiations between the company and the state on incentives.

The other site under consideration was Spring Hill, Tenn.

The Janesville plant would remain in "standby capacity," meaning it could be reopened in the future if market demand increased, GM said. It was originally placed on standby in May, one month after all production there was idled.

Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle said Friday he knew his state was facing an uphill battle against Michigan but said state and local officials still put together a competitive incentive package. The Democratic governor said he was "deeply disappointed" by the decision.

"I do not believe that Michigan matched us," he said in a statement. "I certainly hope that we were not used to simply leverage more resources for Michigan."

Other members of Wisconsin's congressional delegation were similarly disappointed. In a joint statement, U.S. Sens. Herb Kohl and Russ Feingold, as well as U.S. Reps. Paul Ryan, R-Janesville, and Tammy Baldwin, D-Madison, pledged to continue working on behalf of affected citizens.

"The Janesville, Beloit, and Kenosha communities are facing a lot of challenges because of the downturn in the auto industry," the statement said, "and we will continue to work to help these cities as they seek to access the federal resources that are available to auto communities."

Douglas Venable, Janesville's economic development director, said local officials would gather to discuss options for the GM-owned plant and its 4 million square feet of space. GM might bring production back in 2011 if business improves, he said, though city officials could encourage the automaker to sell so other businesses can bring in jobs.

"The uncertainty is the difficult part," Venable said. "At some point families have to decide what they're going to do, if they're going to transfer elsewhere. And the business community, it's hard for them to make investments not knowing if GM is staying or going."

State and city officials would likely "regroup," absorb the bad news and meet as early as next week to plan next steps, he said.

One former autoworker, 47-year-old Vicki Sathre of Janesville, said she had hoped GM would reopen the local plant but suspected the stamping facilities at the Michigan site made it the more logical choice. Sathre, who took a $20,000 buyout in April after 12 years at the plant, said she didn't put much stock in GM's claims that it might reopen the Janesville site down the line.

"You can't live on a wish and a dream," said Sathre, who is studying to become a dental assistant.

Janesville, a town of 60,000 about 75 miles southwest of Milwaukee, has one of the worst unemployment rates in the state.

Janesville's unemployment rate for May was 14.3 percent, slightly improved from 14.7 percent the previous month but still nearly twice the rate from a year ago.

Its SUV production plant was the oldest facility in the GM family. It was built in 1918 for tractor production and converted to a Chevrolet plant in 1923.

Over the years, workers churned out sedans and SUVs, including Chevrolet Suburbans and GMC Yukons. But demand for big vehicles plummeted last year during the days of $4 gas and failed to recover when fuel prices came down.

GM ended SUV production last year two days before Christmas, cutting 1,200 jobs. Another 100 or so workers were retained for four more months to wrap up some contract work.

Doyle said earlier this month the state offered GM a package of incentives to reopen the Janesville plant. He declined to describe the package except to say it would be a significant investment by state and local taxpayers.

The governor had said he hoped GM would reopen the Janesville plant on the strength of the incentives package, the city's history of making popular vehicles and a union contract that was more flexible and competitive than the ones the other plants offered.


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 6 User Comments
Add a Comment
What Will Happen To GM's Wisconsin Plant?  6/26/2009 2:54:00 PM
Two thoughts...first is, I think it is only fair that Michigan retain the production of the vehicle. Neither Wisconsin, nor Tennessee came to the aid of the manufacturer, but merely piled on like a playground brawl.
What Will Happen To GM's Wisconsin Plant?  6/26/2009 2:57:00 PM
the second thought is that if someone is willing to put up some funds, there is a possibility of reuse. It will take some surgery to the facility, but not impossible. Michigan is faced with the same dilemma...closed plant custom built for automobile manufacturing, and not a whole lot else. There is a possible approach to reworking them but it isn't free.
Why any of them?  6/26/2009 5:06:00 PM
It does not matter what plant they "reopen" since you will still have the union mentality of "they owe me". The UAW and unions are what have caused this mess, how does anyone think that GM or any of the rest of the auto companies can really make a go of it with that noose of the union around it's neck???
Just Curious  6/29/2009 7:29:00 AM
A plant like that has a lot of equipment/tools in it. Not only for making the vehicles, but for making the machines work. When they shut a plant down is the equipment just sitting there idle?, do they clean it out? or what happens. Sold to China or Mexico? Thanks
Wisconsin is a Tax Hell  6/29/2009 9:44:00 AM
In light of the state budget that just passed in Wisconsin, A business would have to be completely brain dead to locate a plant in Wisconsin. Even GM isn't that stupid.
Re: why any of them  6/29/2009 3:04:00 PM
Another loudmouth that knows nothing about the inside of an auto plant. The UAW people I know are hardworking, conscientious people. While it is true that there are a few slugs that the union protects, most workers don't need the protection. When the companies were making record profits every year, you would have to be an idiot to not try for a piece of the pie. But thats not the problem, the fact is the companies were mismanaged into the ground. Management never looked any farther than the next quarterly statement. It no wonder rising gas prices caught them flatfooted. I don't have an MBA, but I knew $1.00 a gallon wouldn't last forever. Nor, am I stupid enough to spend 40-50 k on a truck that gets 12 mpg. Sheer stupidity.


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

 

     



   





Flatbed trucking, flatbed shipping, flatbed carriers



Medical

ART To Cut Workforce

GE Creates Handheld Ultrasound Machine

Johnson & Johnson Waits For U.S. Product Approvals


Plastics/Rubber

EPA To Set Standards For PVC Plant Emissions

Goodyear’s 3Q Profit More Than Doubles

Bridgestone Closing Australia, NZ Tire Plants

Metals

ArcelorMitall Gets $32M Energy Grant For Indiana Plant

China Angry Over U.S. Steel Pipe Duties

ArcelorMittal To Keep European Plants Open
News Video