MnetTV          Digital Library

Search Manufacturing.net Search Manufacturing.net
Today in Manufacturing.Net

Resources
Association Links
Bookstore
Digital Library
Events Calendar
Job Search
What’s New
White Papers

Browse White Papers


News
Featured Articles
Financial News
Global Manufacturing
Government News
Mergers & Acquisitions
News Archive
People in the News

Job Search


Market Sectors
Aerospace
Automotive/Transportation
Chemical/Petroleum
Food/Beverage
Medical
Metals
Pharmaceuticals/Biotech
Plastics/Rubber
Other Manufacturing

Industry Focus
Design & Development
Electrical & Electronics
Energy
Environmental
Facilities & Operations
Labor Relations
Manufacturing Technology
Materials
Quality
Safety
Supply Chain

Amazon

About Us
Editorial Contacts
Advertise with Us

Our Partner Sites
Chem.Info
ECN
Food Manufacturing
IMPO (Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation)
Medical Design Technology
Pharmaceutical Processing
Product Design & Development
R & D Magazine
Wireless Design & Development
Wireless Week



 


Mnet house ad 120x240



Deere To Recall 450 Workers In Iowa
By Daniel Lovering, AP Manufacturing Writer
Manufacturing.Net - October 28, 2009

Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague


MOLINE, Ill. (AP) -- Farm equipment maker Deere & Co. said Wednesday it will recall most of the workers it laid off from an Iowa plant earlier this year to start production of the company's 2010 models.

Deere, based in Moline, Ill., said the 452 manufacturing employees will be recalled to its John Deere Ottumwa Works starting Nov. 30. They are expected to return to work before Deere's annual holiday shutdown, which starts Dec. 23.

But 78 other workers will remain laid off until market conditions improve enough to warrant their return, the company said.

In June, Deere said it would temporarily lay off 494 of the factory's workers due to weak demand amid the global economic slowdown. That followed a layoff of 40 employees in April.

The Ottumwa Works, which makes equipment such as balers and pull-type forage harvesters used by hay and livestock producers, employed about 260 salaried employees and 720 wage employees, including those who remain laid off.

Deere, the world's largest maker of farm machinery, has faced diminished demand amid the economic downturn and lower commodity prices, which affect the buying habits of farmers. In August, the company trimmed its sales projections for 2009, saying it expects the biggest single-year sales drop in at least 50 years, but reiterated an annual profit forecast of $1.1 billion.

In response, Deere has cut costs and laid off hundreds of workers, though many have since been recalled. The Ottumwa recall will be the largest of several over the past four months. Other large machinery makers, such as Caterpillar Inc., have been forced to cut larger numbers of workers because of shrinking demand.

Shares of Deere slid $1.33, or 2.8 percent, to $45.63 in afternoon trading.


Printer Friendly     E-mail to a Colleague



Talkback!
Manufacturing.net is pleased to provide you an opportunity to share your opinions on any of the news stories or articles on our site. We reserve the right to edit/remove comments.
Viewing 9 User Comments
Add a Comment
Deere God what wrong with this picture!  10/28/2009 4:35:00 PM
An American company lays off hundreds of people and still has the gall to boast a 1.1 billion dollar profit? What amount of PROFIT would it have taken to keep those people working? JEEEZZZ
People Working?! People Working?!  10/28/2009 6:27:00 PM
Don't you mean on the clock, taking home a check, but "not working"? What part of "not enough work" don't you understand? Americans aren't entitled to a check for not working. Perhaps the French, on the other hand... In fact, if you want socialism, MOVE TO EUROPE!
Is there any middle ground?  10/29/2009 7:04:00 AM
The right claims the left wants a Marxist country where everyone gets entitlements and the left claims that the right wants to create a new aristocracy where there is just the rich and the poor. When billion dollar profits are put ahead of keeping US workers employed I'd say the left is closer to the truth. A few percent of that profit would have kept them all employed and off the the public dole which you and I are paying for.
Middle Ground Comment  10/29/2009 9:02:00 AM
So if there was no work for them at the time they were laid off at Deere what is managment supposed to pay them to do? Play Cards while they wait for production orders to come in? If you are concerned about workers being on the public Dole when they are on layoff from companies that have no work orders, its not the companies fault its the goverments fault for paying folks to sit on their rear ends. Maybe they could be enterprizing and do something else while they wait and see if they get called back and or find a simular job with another company. God forbid maybe they might even need to move to another area to find a job, go back to school, deploy use of a new skill etc. We need to stop being so dependent on the goverment and simply do what it takes to take care of ourselves. If we find ourselves out of work with no skill set it was our choice not to be educated so its never too late to be retrained or go back to school to pick up a skill that there is a higher demand for.....
Deere God & Middle Ground  10/29/2009 11:34:00 AM
Apparently you don't understand, so let me give you the painful truth: businesses exist to make money for investors, shareholders, etc. They do not exist to provide jobs and benefits to people who do not have work to do. Well, that is until Chairman Obama & company come up with a law that makes it illegal to lay off employees just because they have nothing to do.
Circle of life  10/29/2009 12:41:00 PM
America is falling apart from a flawed business attitude. A company can make a 10% profit one year and must improve to 14% the next to appear profitable. If they only make an 8% PROFIT then they have LOST 2% for the shareholders. The only way to maintain this is to reduce expenditures or raise the cost of goods. The easiest way to reduce expenditures is to get rid of employees and manufacture offshore. The employees can not buy homes or go to shopping malls to buy the product. So the company must lay off more people to make more of a profit. Until we have what we have now, the lion eating its own to survive because they have eliminated the food source.
More from middle ground  10/29/2009 3:26:00 PM
What happens when all that's left are shareholders and the people who are laid off? Our company is a Deere supplier has laid people off to the point where we are just above the breakeven point. The plant runs 4 days a week and Friday is clean up day for production. Of course a company needs to make money but when there are billion dollar profits, there are guys taking home more the all the laid off workers put togeather. Luckily the stimulus is starting to work and most of the workers are being called back.
JOHN DEERE   10/30/2009 2:15:00 PM
I DIDN'T KNOW COMPANIES WERE OBLIGED TO GIVE YOU A JOB EVEN THOUGH THERE ISN'T ANY WORK, MAYBE WE SHOULDN'T AUTOMATE THINGS SO THAT MORE PEOPLE WOULD HAVE JOBS - OH STUPID ME - IF WE DO THAT SO OTHER COUNTRY WILL RULE THESE INDUSTRIES.
Reply  10/30/2009 3:16:00 PM
If companies dont have employees to buy stuff then there is no work to give to employees so they can have money to buy stuff from companies so companies can have employees. No employees, no companies.


Add a Comment...

E-Mail:
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Subject:
Comment:

 

     



   





Flatbed trucking, flatbed shipping, flatbed carriers



Aerospace

Northrop Grumman Gains $303M Air Force Contract

Boeing Breaks Ground On S.C. 787 Plant

Airbus Tests All 4 Military Airlifter Engines


Plastics/Rubber

Goodyear Raises Tire Prices To Offset Costs

Chemical BPA Linked To Sex Problems In Workers

EU Fines Plastics Cartel For Price Fixing

Food/Beverage

Imperial Sugar To Build Cane Sugar Plant

Weather May Cause Pumpkin Pie Shortage

Pinnacle Buys Birds Eye For $1.3 Billion
News Video